Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:25:39 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No, no, it IS the problem! As Mike Ignatius explained, MP put the beads on the slide, not the coverslip, then add mountant and then the coverslip. If you are using a #1.5 coverslip you need to put the beads directly on the coverslip. With the beads on the slide the extra thickness of the mountant needs to be corrected for by using a thinner coverslip - #1 or #0 - which must be found by trial and error. (But since I guess they are using very reproducible conditions they only need to do the test once). At least it seems they have realized they have a problem.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of MICROSCOPIA CONFOCAL y CCD
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 10:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FocalCheck test slide
>Thanks a lot for your answers.
>Of course I put the slide upside down when using
>inverted microscope and I asked for Molecular
>probes about coverslip and they answered me:
>"The coverslip thickness for the FocalCheck
>prepared slides is 0.13-0.16 mm" It´s no ideal
>but I think that this is not the problem.
M. Teresa
SERVICIO de MICROSCOPIA CONFOCAL y CCD
Mª Teresa Seisdedos Domínguez
Oscar Hidalgo Blanco
Amadeo Cazaña Soto
[log in to unmask]
Centro Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB) CSIC
C/Ramiro de Maeztu, 9
28040 Madrid
Phone: + 34-91 8373112 ext.4401
Fax: + 34-91 536 04 32
|
|
|