CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 2010

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:24:21 -0700
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
zhan cheng <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi Jacqui,
     I list the problems on our EMCCD here:
     1)	The brightness of images field is not equal. The left-bottom corner
is much dimmer than other fields.
3)	The EMCCD’s sensitivities are much lower than before. Even for strong
fluorescence signal, the images look quite dim. It is not a single-photon
CCD any longer.
4)	When set the EM gain’s value at 4.7, the background image is not uniform. 
5)	There seems something wrong with the output TTL trigger signal’s voltage
value. We use the “fire” output to trigger the shutter’s open/close.
Recently three shutter drivers from the uniblitz are broken down during a
week. We guess the trigger signal from the EMCCD is not stable.
          Abover are the problems I can find.
  About the cooling system of the EMCCD, it seems ok. The cooling
temperature looks normal, at least show normal by the control software.  If
there are seal problems as Jim mentioned, what can I do?
           I appreciated your reply very much. I attend a meeting during the
past days, so sorry for my delayed reply.
         Zhan Cheng
     
-- 
View this message in context: http://confocal-microscopy-list.588098.n2.nabble.com/EMCCD-problem-tp5383096p5414709.html
Sent from the Confocal Microscopy List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2