CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2011

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:45:28 -0700
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Armstrong, Brian" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

David, I think from a theoretical viewpoint the multiphoton would have worse resolution because of the higher lambda (d = 900nm * 0.61 / NA), but better resolution due to smaller focal spot of 2P, so the resolution should be roughly equal to CLSM.

In practice (in my hands at least) CLSM images appear to have much better resolution. I would choose CLSM over 2P for the application you describe. 
Part of the problem as I see it comes from the wide excitation band of 2PE, meaning that you are exciting many fluorophores with a single wavelength, and you do not have this problem when using a "vis" laser.

Also, I think per unit area, in the focal spot, the 2PE will kill live cells faster than 1PE.

Cheers,   

Brian D Armstrong PhD
Assistant Research Professor
Light Microscopy Core 
Beckman Research Institute
City of Hope
Dept of Neuroscience
1450 E Duarte Rd
Duarte, CA 91010
626-256-4673 x62872

http://www.cityofhope.org/research/support/Light-Microscopy-Digital-Imaging/Pages/default.aspx


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Knecht charter
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Live cell imaging with multiphoton confocal

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I have limited experience with multi-photon confocal microscopes.  I tried imaging live cells with one a while back and was unimpressed with the results as compared to a standard laser scanning instrument.  If you had a new single photon instrument and a new multi-photon instrument sitting side by side in your facility (and I presume some of you do), which would you choose for imaging  fixed cells or live cells in culture (not trying to go deep into tissue)?  Thanks- Dave

Dr. David Knecht    
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility
U-3125
91 N. Eagleville Rd.
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
860-486-2200
860-486-4331 (fax)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING:  
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are addressed. This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law (e.g., personal health information, research data, financial information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption, individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from the sender. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2