CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"G. Esteban Fernandez" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:42:13 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I use Labtek I (#1.0 glass) and they do not have the tabs.  Recently
ordered #1 chambers still fit in my ~7 year old LabTek-specific warming
stage insert.

-Esteban


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:53 AM, els vanstreels <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
>  Hi Michael,
> The difference is between the Labtek and the Labtek II version of the
> chambered coverglass. The first one has the no. 1 and the second has the no
> 1.5 coverglass bottom.  As far as I know both models are still available
> (at
> least over here..).  Whenever we us the II version, we simply cut off the
> tab with an ordinary wire-shear.
>
> Best regards
>
> Els
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On
> Behalf Of Cammer, Michael
> Sent: woensdag 13 maart 2013 16:17
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [CONFOCALMICROSCOPY] Nunc Lab-Tek problem
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Hi.
>
> For many years we used Nunc Lab-Tek chambered coverglasses. They were
> great.
>
> However, they recently began shipping a different design with the same
> product number. The chambers no longer fit in our microscope stages
> inserts.
> Also, the volume changed.
> see http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcammer/sets/72157632984171809/
>
> While we can adjust to the volume change, the plastic tab at the end of the
> chamber is a big problem.
>
> I thought of having people cut the tab off before doing experiments, but
> this would produce a lot of plastic dust (and we'd have to buy a suitable
> saw or dremel).
>
> Does anybody know of an alternative manufacturer or if the old style
> chambers are still available from somewhere?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> Michael Cammer, Assistant Research Scientist Skirball Institute of
> Biomolecular Medicine
> Lab: (212) 263-3208  Cell: (914) 309-3270
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2