CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Josef Gotzmann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:42:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Dear List,

I have a technical questions: 
When we live image cells (in buffered saline, pH7.4) expressing GFP- and
mCherry-labeled proteins, respectively, on our confocal and we add a drug
(dissolved in DMSO) we rapidly (within seconds) lose fluorescence of both
dyes. After a very sharp drop down to 50% of intensity within the first 2
minutes, we reach a plateau (2-5minutes), followed by another less sharp,
though steady, decrease in fluorescence for another 2 minutes.
This is the effect we see with an end concentration of 1% DMSO, which is
completely absent when are scaling down the DMSO concentration to 0,1% !
We have already ruled out that it's simple bleaching due to lightning
conditions.
My understanding was that the OH-radical scavenging properties of DMSO
should more stabilize fluorescence!?
Anyone an idea how DMSO can act like that?

thx
Josef

ATOM RSS1 RSS2