CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gregg Sobocinski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:56:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Our 561nm diode laser went bad on a confocal system, and it has taken 2
months to obtain a new one. I pose four lines of questioning to the list:

1) Have people tried refurbishing old lasers? How did they perform?
2) Do you believe that refurbished lasers are a good value at half the
price of new replacement?
3) Do lasers degrade while sitting unused on a shelf? (Should we have a
refurbished laser on hand for next time, or should we wait?)
4) Is two months typical for ordering a laser without a service contract?
Are lasers in that short of supply?

Thanks in advance to all responders.
~Gregg
-- 
*Gregg Sobocinski*
Microscope Imaging Specialist
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2