CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2014

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Laevsky, Gary S." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:27:45 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hello All,

Chromatic aberration is an artifact produced by differing wavelengths passing through a medium with a refractive index, and that n affects different wavelengths differently. 

In the example of a chromatically corrected objective, multiple wavelengths pass through a very specific combination of lenses to reduce the artifact/mis-alignment. 

When imaging a sample, say a monolayer or a tissue sample, the excitation (and emission for that matter) wavelengths pass through multiple n's.  Will this induce chromatic aberration in the emission pathway?

How is this corrected for?  In the objective again?  Or is it not necessary, or insignificant within the realm of light microscopy resolution. If not necessary for "standard" light microscopy, what about super res?

Thank you for explaining. 

Best,

Gary


Sent from my iPad

ATOM RSS1 RSS2