CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vitaly Boyko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vitaly Boyko <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2015 03:36:02 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

 

Dear Members,it is a kind of known that multi-photon microscopy is "smart" on the excitation and "dumb" on the emission side. To challenge my "over flattened bimodal exaggeration" has someone compared performance of the one photon microscopy in the near-IR portion of spectra (with near-IR dye emission max in the range of 750-950 nm) with multi-photon microscopy of, let say, EGFP/Alexa 488 in sensitivity (in pico-nano Molar range, hopefully), SNR, photo-toxicity, emission light scattering, etc.?Any reference would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Vitaly
   
   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2