CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stanislav Vitha <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:35:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

My guess (without much practical experience) is that the near IR confocal 
will have issues in terms of detector sensitivity if you are using a point 
scanner and PMTs; Most PMTs have pretty low QE in near-IR, with just few 
exceptions. APD or camera-based detection may work better.

Whether the lower sensitivity on the detection side is offset by improved 
excitation (1-p versus 2-P) is an interesting question.


Stan Vitha
Microscopy and Imaging Center
Texas A&M University

 

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2