CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Marino <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:55:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

What did you use as a mounting media? Do you see the lateral shift when you look through the eyepieces?

> On Apr 21, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Christophe Leterrier <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
> 
> Dear microscopists,
> 
> I am using a very nice TIRF microscope with a 100X, 1.49 NA objective. I
> had the impression that there was a slight lateral shift when defocusing up
> and down, so I checked the PSF with 100 nm beads on a HR #1.5 coverslip.
> What appears on the attached image (three planes taken at -1, 0 and +1 um)
> is that the PSF is not rotationnally symetric, i.e.more intense on the
> left-bottom side :
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_JeGjE7nBHWWFViM0pwSy0xR3M/view
> 
> This asymetry is quite constant over the field of view  (it is not radial
> relative to the center of the field). It does not depend on the
> illumination (it is the same under azimutal laser, TIRF laser,
> epifluorescence lamp). It does not depend on the filter cube used. Finally
> (and this is what surprises me the most), I got another brand new 100X,
> 1.49 objective for testing and it still shows up (the attached image is
> taken with the new objective).
> 
> Do you have an idea if what could be wrong, and how to correct it? Could it
> be caused by an internal lens? By the sample used?
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
> Christophe

Eric Marino
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2