Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 24 Aug 1995 12:25:01 -1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>Confocal folk:
>>We are reconstructing the body-wall musculature in lower worms
>> using BODIPY/Phalloidin and confocal.
>>So far, we have no trouble importing the MRC-1000 files to NIH Image
>> and creating both stacks and projections (Thanks, Harvey Karten!),
>> which are extremely informative, as long as they're animated.
>>We are now to the point of wanting to make "pretty pictures" of stills for
>> for seminars. If I want a rendered, shaded reconstruction, do I
>> have any alternatives other than a SGI and Voxel View
>> (financially out of the question). I'm aware of VolVis,
>> but how do I get from the confocal image stack to voxel data? Is there a
>> standalone program that does the necessary interpolation between image
>> planes in the stack?
>>TIA
>>Julian Smith III
>
>Voxel View will run on Macs as well and the Mac version is much cheaper than
>the Silicon Graphics one.
>
>Vaytek have a package caled VoxBlast which is available for PC or Mac
>(and Unix, at a higher price). I use an old version of Voxblast on my
>personal PC and have VoxelView on a Silicon Graphics which is used by
>all the many users of our lab. I find both useful.
>
>The one drawback with PC or Mac versions of both packages is that they
>use dongles for copy protection, and in my experience these are very
>unreliable devices, prone to failure and also liable to have unforeseen
>side effects on computer operation. It is very annoying to have a
>$1000 piece of software unusable because of a device which is only
>there because the vendor doesn't trust me.
>
> Guy Cox
> [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|