CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 1995

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stamatis N. Pagakis" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Sep 1995 11:21:47 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Fri, 15 Sep 1995, Erik Manders wrote:
 
> Try to avoid sequential scanning!
> It induces positional shift between the red and the green
> image. If you scan both colours simultaneously, you will
> have also some shift (50-200 nm) but you can correct for
> that because it is for all recordings the same. Re-scanning,
> however, induces unpredictable shift, so, correction is not
> possible.
 
I would like to add here that the shift during simultaneous acquisition
appears to be axial chromatic error, which is usually introduced by the
objective lens. Therefore, recalibration is needed for each lens.
 
******************************************************************************
Stamatis Pagakis
University Laboratory of Physiology            [log in to unmask]
University of Oxford, Parks Rd.                FAX:  +44 (0)1865 272469
Oxford OX1 3PT,   United Kingdom               Tel:  +44 (0)1865 272551

ATOM RSS1 RSS2