CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Paul Goodwin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 May 1996 10:57:47 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Comments:
To: "Martin W. Wessendorf" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Martin-
 
I shattered one once which led us to rapidly change vendors to 3M which
seem much more durable. Yes, they will scratch and you can kill them. I
wouldn't suggest you play catch with any media that you care about :).
 
________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Paul Goodwin
Image Analysis Lab
FHCRC, Seattle, WA
 
On Thu, 30 May 1996, Martin W. Wessendorf wrote:
 
> In message  <[log in to unmask]> Aloisia Schmidt
> writes:
> >        Another question.  We are considering switching to a CD data
> > storage system because it is so much cheaper.  Does anyone have any
> > experience in comparing optical disks to CDs for storing large z-series of
> > data, i.e., extremely large files?   I would be storing z-series of about
> > 10 MB.  I know about not being able to edit CDs, but other than that?
>
> One other question for the group: has anyone out there torture-tested a
> recordable-CD diskette after it's been written?  Someone recently pointed out
> that they lack the layer of varnish that protects commercial CD's.  Has anyone
> left one out in the sun, or shown a laser at one, or stomped on one/scratched
> one to see how well the data survive?
>
> Martin Wessendorf
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2