CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Meridian or Noran confocals?
From:
David Knecht <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Dec 1996 23:49:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
We are planning a grant to purchase a new confocal, presumably one with
faster acquisition (video rate?) and better sensitivity than our MRC600.  I
have been rereading some of the old traffic regarding what is the "best"
confocal in current opinion.  I have heard virtually nothing about the
Noran and Meridian instruments in comparison to Nikon, Zeiss, BIorad and
Leica.  Are they not worth the energy to investigate or do the users not
read this list?  Dave

Dr. David Knecht
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of Connecticut
U-125
Storrs, CT 06269
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2