CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Richard L. Nuccitelli" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Dec 1996 06:21:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On the contrary.  The Noran Oz is the best "fast" confocal system available.
I have played with it at Woods Hole last summer and was quite impressed.
The software is the best available on any confocal out there and it
routinely does 30 full frames/second.  This is ten times faster than the
Leica and 30 times faster than Zeiss or BioRad.  While I did not purchase
this machine for my multiuser facility, it is only because the Leica
satisfies a larger user base better.  However, as a second machine I would
definitely go for the Noran Oz.
Rich Nuccitelli

At 11:49 PM 12/12/96 -0500, you wrote:
>We are planning a grant to purchase a new confocal, presumably one with
>faster acquisition (video rate?) and better sensitivity than our MRC600.  I
>have been rereading some of the old traffic regarding what is the "best"
>confocal in current opinion.  I have heard virtually nothing about the
>Noran and Meridian instruments in comparison to Nikon, Zeiss, BIorad and
>Leica.  Are they not worth the energy to investigate or do the users not
>read this list?  Dave
>
>Dr. David Knecht
>Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
>University of Connecticut
>U-125
>Storrs, CT 06269
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
Richard Nuccitelli
Molecular and Cellular Biology
University of California, Davis
Davis, CA 95616
(916)752-3152 FAX:(916)752-1449

ATOM RSS1 RSS2