Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 1997 12:01:56 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear fellow microscopists,
Can someone enlighten me on the potential pitfalls of RI mismatch
between coverslip and immersion oil. I am working with someone who must
grow his cells on Aclar coverslips (RI = 1.435). We are mounting the
specimens in Vectashield (RI = 1.4577) and are using Zeiss oil (RI =
1.515). We are trying to do confocal reconstructions of fluorescently
tagged (FL and RH) mineral aggregates in these cultures (approx. 10-20 um
thick) to visualize their substructure. To do this we are using 100X oil
immersion lens at Zoom 4 on a Leica TCS-NT confocal. What sorts of
aberrations could I expect in the reconstructed images?? Should I use an
oil with a lower RI?
A related question: Most of the fluorescent specimens I work with
have glass coverslips and are imaged with oil immersion objective lenses
(consistent RI), but are mounted in Vectashield (Lower RI) or similar
anti-photobleach medium. What problems does this pose for confocal
imaging??
Judy Drazba, Ph.D. ([log in to unmask])
Confocal Microscopy Facility, NC-3
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44195-5001
Office (216)445-3760
FAX (216)444-7927
|
|
|