CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marshall (Chip) Montrose" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jan 1997 12:19:15 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Stephen T. Haley, II wrote:

> The trouble arose when I tried to check the
> validity of my measurements with some InSpeck beads from Molecular
> Probes.  The beads are calibrated to several relative intensities. To
> make a long story short I found out that the system is not linear.

Hi Stephen,
        First make sure that your detectors are operating in manual control
mode: you will have all sorts of problems if they are trying to cleverly
adjust ("optimize") your image intensity while you are not looking. A
more likely site of problem is in your setting of the background in your
image. If you take an image where there is no fluorescence (air, water,
whatever), and then make a histogram of the results, all your values in
the image must STILL be above zero. Otherwise when you go to take
fluorescence images, you will not be linear.

In essense I am encouraging you to make sure your background subtraction
is correct prior to quantifying your fluorescence.

Good luck. Chip
--
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
M.H. Montrose, Ph.D.
   Johns Hopkins University             tel: 410-955-9681
      Ross 930                              FAX: 410-955-9677
         720 Rutland Avenue                            email: [log in to unmask]
            Baltimore, MD 21205
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

ATOM RSS1 RSS2