CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Damian Neuberger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jul 1997 08:55:07 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2259 bytes) , RFC822 message headers (1202 bytes)
     Yes we are putting our images on CD ROMs in various Photoshop formats
     and reading them on both Power Mac/Macs and PCs - no problem.  We
     haven't gone to the multiple session, do it yourself CDs but we have
     someone here make them on a higher quality, dedicated system,
     presumably because it is more reliable in giving us an error free
     disk.  Also I disagree about Zip drives, we use them to transfer large
     numbers of images from our lab to our customers; however, I've been
     told by computer sales that Zip drives are discontinued. Any
     confirmation?  If so, that goes along with a previous message about
     archiving digital images when the hardware won't be around to read the
     data.  I have already run into this with data stored on 8 1/2"
     floppies for a Kevex EDXS instrument that is no longer around.  Here
     is a business opportunity for someone who wants to archive all this
     old equipment to read archived data; of course, you'll need extra
     units for spare parts....:-)

     Hope this answers your question, Tom.

     Damian Neuberger
     [log in to unmask]


Our multi-user facility is currently archiving our confocal and LM digital
images on Panasonic optical disks (re-writable, very stable @ about $125
for 1 GB).  The disadvantage is that few of our users have their own
Panasonic drives so most people simply archive the images at our core and
then move the ones they want by FTP as needed.  I would like to switch to a
more universal medium - namely CD ROM's.  My understanding is that CD's can
now be written to in multiple sessions so you don't need to fill an entire
disk at once.  Furthermore, it is my understanding that a disk of TIFF
images should be readable by both IBM/WINTEL and Mac/PowerPC types
computers.  Is anybody actually doing this?  Comments on how reliable are
the recorders, which ones are best, pitfalls, etc would be appreciated.
Before I get a dozen advocates of ZIP/Jazz drives, I don't want to go that
route since that they are not as ubiquitous as CD drives.    Thanks in
advance.


Thomas E. Phillips, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Biological Sciences
Director, Molecular Cytology Core Facility
3 Tucker Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211
(573)-882-4712 (voice)
(573)-882-0123 (fax)




Received: from ns1.baxter.com (159.198.180.56) by ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com with SMTP   (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 00159806; Wed, 23 Jul 97 13:23:08 -0500 Received: from Sparc5.Microscopy.Com (sparc5.microscopy.com [206.69.208.10]) by ns1.baxter.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id NAA13273; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 13:33:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by Sparc5.Microscopy.Com (8.6.11/8.6.11) id KAA08982 for dist-Microscopy; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:21:35 -0500 Received: from biosci.mbp.missouri.edu (biosci.mbp.missouri.edu [128.206.15.250]) by Sparc5.Microscopy.Com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA08979 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:21:33 -0500 Received: from [128.206.15.189] by biosci.mbp.missouri.edu with  ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 1.1.2); Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:33:23 -0500 Message-Id: <v03007801affbd2bb00ac@[128.206.15.189]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:32:48 -0500 To: [log in to unmask] From: Tom Phillips <[log in to unmask]> Subject: CD-ROM's for archiving - any experience? Cc: [log in to unmask] Errors-to: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2