CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 1998

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Martin Wessendorf <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 1998 15:31:21 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Martin Wessendorf <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Dear confocalers--

A friend is in the market for a confocal and has asked me which confocal is
best.  Price is not a huge consideration, but he's not in the range of a
2-photon instrument.  Anyone compared the Big Three (Leica, Zeiss, Bio-Rad)
recently and want to stick out their neck with an opinion of their relative
strengths?

Thanks!

Martin Wessendorf, PhD
Univ Minnesota

ATOM RSS1 RSS2