CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 1998

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Auty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Apr 1998 10:00:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Udo

I just carried out an experiment comparing images with a x63 and
x100 objective on bacteria stained with nile blue and I have to admit
that images were not significantly different. Using the zoom with a
x63 lens does not result in a more "pixelated" image for the reasons
already described. Perhaps I have a natural suspicion about using a
zoom. I do, however, use the x100 quite a lot for optical microscopy
and would still recommend it for that purpose.

Thanks to you guys out there for correcting my rash statements -
Apologies, Udo, for causing any confusion. For confocal work only,
the x63 would be best, particularly since you will be looking at
microbial populations rather than individual cells.
Mark Auty
Dairy Products Research Centre
Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
[log in to unmask]
tel 00353 2542447
fax 00353 2542340

ATOM RSS1 RSS2