CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 1998

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Apr 1998 17:53:54 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>Does anyone have any comments or suggestions for a source of standards
>as well as on the whole issue of the relationship between intensities
>(WITHIN AN IMAGE).


I think there is no perfect answer here.  However there are a couple of
points to make.  First, is you are looking at the ration of intensities
in two comprtments you must subtract the actual measured background
first (I know this sounds obvious but people do forget).

Second, you need to be sure that neither fluorochrome is saturating -
going from (eg) the 3% ND to the 1% should reduce both signals to
one third.

Third, this provides a direct check on linearity of the detection system -
use a fluorochrome that won't saturate or bleach and check that increasing
the % of the laser power reaching the sample is increasing the signal
proportionately.

                                        Guy Cox

Dr. Guy Cox,   |                    ooOOOOOOoo
E.M. Unit, F09 |        #       oOOOO  |  |  OOOOo       #
Univ of Sydney |       ###    OOO|  |  |  |  |  |OOO    ###
NSW 2006,      |       ###  OOO  |  |  |  |  |  |  OOO  ###
Australia      |       ### OO |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | OO ###
Phone:         |      #####   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   #####
+61 2 9351 3176| =====#####============================#####=====
Fax:           |      #####                            #####
+61 2 9351 7682|    ~~#####~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#####~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2