Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Holy cow! That's a pretty extreme situation. You should be the company's
'poster child'! @:-)
Craig
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Rietdorf, Jens <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Dear Craig,
>
>
>
> We use it for 'simple' confocal microscopy. We are located in a city, close
> to a railway station, we have some centrifuges running next door, our
> facility is on the 2nd floor (not my idea to build it there), so we never
> reached anywhere near the resolution specs until we switched to active
> dumping.
>
>
>
> jens
>
>
>
> *From:* Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
> Behalf Of *Craig Brideau
> *Sent:* Monday, July 21, 2008 11:28 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: help for optical table choice
>
>
>
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> If I might ask, what application were you using that you required active
> damping? I haven't heard of this a whole lot outside of AFM and the
> semiconductor industry, although I see it is becoming more popular for
> highly sensitive applications.
>
> Craig
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Rietdorf, Jens <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>
> we got excellent results with the TS series tables from
> http://www.hwlscientific.com/ (no commercial interest) in an environment
> where all kinds of passive dumping have failed. You may want to include
> these into your evaluation.
>
> Best, jens
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Jean-Pierre CLAMME
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 12:20 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: help for optical table choice
>
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm shopping for an optical table for a new confocal / 2photon
> microscope
> and FCS setup and I was wondering what kind of grade I need.
> Indeed for the 2 photon microscope that we have here ((the new one is
> for
> another place) , we have a TMC 784 series (maximum dry damping) table.
> I
> saw somewhere that this table is equivalent to the RS 4000 series from
> NEWPORT.
> So I was wondering if this grade is really necessary for a confocal
> microscope and FCS system. Or if as long as I have pneumatic legs, a
> RS2000
> or 783 (standard damping) would be fine ?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> JP
>
>
>
|
