CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2014

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christophe Leterrier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:04:57 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I've a question about super-resolution microscopy: what is the standard way
of estimating how much power reaches the sample in PALM/STORM experiments?

Let's say I've measured my laser power at the tip of the coupling optical
fiber (entering the microscope stand) to be 100 mW. How do I estimate the
power on the sample (in kW/cm^2) if I use a 100X objective? Using the TIRF
arm field number (16 mm) and objective magnification (100X) I get an
illuminated area of 20,000 µm^2, so even with 100% efficiency (which is
unlikely given the objective non-perfect transmission), that only
translates into 2 kW/cm^2 on the sample, which is quite low.

Given than a lot of STORM papers report powers in the 5-50 kW/cm^2 range, I
wonder if something is wrong in my calculation? I don't want a precise
measurement (which would necessitate measuring the actual output downstream
of the objective), but more a reliable way to get an estimate.

Thanks for your help,

--
Christophe Leterrier
Chercheur
Equipe Architecture des Domaines Axonaux
CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 - Aix Marseille Université

ATOM RSS1 RSS2