CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2011

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Brideau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I went with Pavilion Integration Corp for a 638nm diode laser.  It works
well and the price was reasonable.  They have pretty good noise control on
their electronics so I think they would be stable enough for what you want.
 They also offer direct modulation, either digital or analog.

Craig


On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Neil Kad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Surprisingly I didn't find this topic on a search of the archives, so here
> it is:
>
> Does anyone have experience of the cheaper solid-state and diode laser
> sources?
>
> Wavelength ranges from 450nm up to 560nm?
>
> We need good stability and power control up to 50mW for TIRF
> applications...
>
> I see a number for sale but I'm concerned that these lasers are not up to
> scratch.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> Cheers
>
> Neil
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2