CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2005

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Csucs Gabor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:40:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hello Danielle,

We went through the same procedure about a half a year ago. Finally we
had chosen the Chameleon - mainly because it was said that the
collaboration/communication between Zeiss and Coherent (in Switzerland)
is somehow better. This turned to be false.... Parameter wise (as others
have also mentioned it ) the Mai Tai and the Chameleon are identical and
also on the Zeiss-software control side there is no difference. So I'd
suggest that you take the cheaper one (in our case this would have been
the Mai Tai).

Gabor

ATOM RSS1 RSS2