CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2012

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Vergara, Leoncio A." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:10:58 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

not to high jack the thread but... realtive to controlling hardware, anybody using metamorph to run the Prairie Swept field confocal?  ..

________________________________________
From: Confocal Microscopy List [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Cameron Nowell [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: MetaMorph versus Elements?

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi List,

To follow up on Alison's point. Controlling hardware with MetaMorph can
be really powerful. While it can do all the normal capture
(multi-channel, time lapse etc.) you have all the power of the journal
function available too. We have managed to setup journals that take
overview scans of four slides, let the user draw a box around the
tissue(s) of interest and it will then tile scan each of those areas
without any further user intervention. You can also setup journals to
change objectives etc during a time lapse as well. The possibilities are
virtually endless.

And as Alison says the support is great from the guys at MM. I haven't
had a question they can't answer yet (must try harder).

Cheers

Cam



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Alison North
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012 5:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: MetaMorph versus Elements?

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi Michelle,

We use both programs here - for acquisition as well as analysis.  I
agree with much of what has been said so far, but I would like to add
one other great thing about MetaMorph on the acquisition side - it is
extremely flexible when it comes to controlling new hardware, in fact
the guys at the company have written at least three new drivers for
different cameras or whatever when we have asked for their help.  The
larger companies, such as Nikon, will probably write the necessary
drivers eventually but I have been very impressed by the speed of
response from the MM guys.

All the best,
Alison


On 3/12/2012 8:28 PM, Michelle Aloni wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Dear all,
>
> If any one of you had already compared MetaMorph (we have 7.6 version)

> with the NIKON Elements software I would appreciate it very much if
> you share with me your opinion.
>
> If you used both of them, how do they compare? Which one would be your

> personal choice and why?
>
> Thank you ahead of time
>
> Michelle Aloni MS, HTL (ASCP)
> Research Specialist
> USC Keck School of Medicine

--
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center, The Rockefeller
University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office     ++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab        ++ 212 327 7486
Fax:            ++ 212 327 7489


This communication is intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or subject to copyright; the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd does not waive any rights if you have received this communication in error.
The views expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2