Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:42:53 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Eric,
Without more information, this sounds like an artifact problem. On
what basis have you determined that the object of interest is not
moving? There is always the trivial issue of estimating the exact
position of an object related to noise in the measurement but I think
you are referring to something that's giving larger apparent
displacements?
Sub-resolution fluorescent lipid vesicles electrostatically absorbed
onto slides/coverslips, when imaged at a high frame rate, can appear
to move about owing to thermal or Brownian motion but on average stay
at one x-y position. Objects can move owing to displacement of fluid
because the medium is drying out and there is actual hydrostatic
induced displacement of the object related to asymmetry in fluid
movement. Mechanical vibrations, and other artifacts can cause
apparent positional displacements.
Can you be more specific about what you mean by sampling frequency
(confocal dwell time? or is it W.F. frame rate?), live cell or fixed
cell imaging, and what distances are you referring to relative to
optical resolution?
Mario
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>I am curious how people have dealt with the issue of variance in
>positional measurement ( using the measuring tool in ImageJ, for
>example) and its contribution to particle speed measurements. The
>positional variance produces paradoxical "speed" for non moving
>particles - if particle displacement is determined between
>successive images. This effect directly increases with sampling
>frequency.
>
>I have looked at a number of papers on cell migration and not found
>a correction or mention of this effect - which can be large for high
>sampling frequencies.
>One idea would be to define a minimum detectable displacement based
>on the standard deviation of the measurement. Every value less than
>that minimum would be set to zero???
>
>Thanks,
>Eric
>
>
>Eric C. Olson, PhD
>Assistant Professor
>Department of Neuroscience and Physiology
>SUNY Upstate Medical
>3295 Weiskotten Hall
>766 Irving St.
>Syracuse, NY 13210
>
>office: 315-464-7776
>lab : 315-464-8157
--
________________________________________________________________________________
Mario M. Moronne, Ph.D.
ph (510) 528-2400
Fax (510) 528-8076
cell (510) 367-8497
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|