CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Pawley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:16:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi all,

Yes, scanning the specimen does make transmission confocal almost 
possible: as long as the refractive index of the specimen is entirely 
constant. (i.e., the specimen is dead and stained)
focal plane and the coverslip on the "in" direction than they are on 
the "out" direction, then even if you initially  line up the 
illumination optics to coincide with the detection path, you will 
find that this overlap will change as the specimen is moved past the 
spot.

Consequently, the amount of signal actually passing through the 
detection pinhole depends not only on how much absorbing material is 
located at the focus of the laser but also (negatively) on the degree 
of misalignment. i.e. the output signal is no longer dependent on 
events occurring at the focal spot and therefore the resulting data 
no longer can be thought of as coming from an optical section.

There have been suggestions that this "dynamic misalignment" problem 
could be avoided if the detector were not a fixed pinhole but a 
mini-image recording device (say a 5x5 CCD). As this spot was 
displaced from the axis by the inhomogeneities of the specimen, it 
would be tracked, the centroid of the spot located and its intensity 
measured. Sort of a movable pinhole to track the displaced spot to 
keep the whole system "confocal".

This would be neat (In fact is was one proposed uses for the 
"EM-CCiode" detector proposed by me and others) but it would be 
really complicated to sort out the data. Probably for this reason, it 
has not been done.

The other reason is that it really isn't clear what useful 
information would be obtained from the transmitted light signal that 
could not be obtained far more easily by detecting Backscattered 
light. Using any laser line, BSL will give you a lovely, 
fully-confocal  darkfield image that shows all inhomogeneities as 
white.

For more  information, you might look at the chapter on Transmission 
Confocal by Carol Cogswell in the Second edition (but not the Third) 
of the Handbook.

Cheers,

Jim P.

-- 
               **********************************************
Prof. James B. Pawley,                		            Ph.  608-263-3147
Room 223, Zoology Research Building, 
FAX  608-265-5315
1117 Johnson Ave., Madison, WI, 53706 
[log in to unmask]
3D Microscopy of Living Cells Course, June 14-26, 2008, UBC, Vancouver Canada
Info: http://www.3dcourse.ubc.ca/ 	     Applications due by March 15, 2008
	       "If it ain't diffraction, it must be statistics." Anon.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2