CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Pawley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:50:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (110 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Juan,

I encourage you to pursue the use of this 
instrument for looking at transparent inorganic 
materials!

However, I also echo Mike's caution about the 
effects of surface angle and add the point that 
"materials" seldom have a refractive index of 1.

When using the no-coverslip dry objectives common 
in materials, you have spherical aberration the 
moment you penetrate into the material and any 
measurements in z will require at least a 
"back-of-the-envelope" correction for the actual 
RI of the material between the near surface and 
the focus plane. You will get different results 
with different lenses because of differences in 
NA (and therefore SA).

You can reduce this all somewhat if you can 
immerse your "rock" in oil and use an oil 
objective but be careful that the "rock" doesn't 
get a chance to touch (i.e., "Scratch!") the 
front element of the objective.

While the oil will help some, as the "rock" is 
unlikely to have an RI of exactly 1.515, there 
will still be some SA and the directional 
dependence of surface reflections can still be a 
problem.

On the other hand, you should be able to get good 
contrast from small inclusions. If these are 
small with respect to the wavelength of the 
light, they scatter in all directions rather than 
reflecting. (hence, "backscattered light" rather 
than "reflected light")

It turns out that living cells are often full of 
very small highly refractile objects are can be 
imaged very well using this signal.

Cheers,

Jim P.


>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>It's typically done using interferometry. 
>Reflection mode in confocal can be tricky 
>because the signal depends on the tilt of the 
>surface (see P.C.Cheng's articles in Confocal 
>Handbook)
>
>Mike
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Confocal Microscopy List 
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf 
>Of Juan Luis Ribas
>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:19 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: reflection mode in material science
>
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>Dear all,
>Several groups in our University are moving now to the confocal to
>perform z profiles of materials. I would like to get more information
>about the way of doing a correct adquisition in reflection mode to
>ensure a realistic depth map. I've found that a z profile in the same
>region with different air objectives give very different measurements,
>so I'm not sure which is the real value. And is very difficult to obtain
>some useful information about this technique.
>I'll be very grateful if someone could recomend me  some link, book or
>paper about reflection mode and z profile caracterization in materials.
>All the best
>
>Juan Luis
>
>--
>Juan Luis Ribas, PhD
>Servicio de Microscopía
>Centro de Investigación, Tecnología e Innovación
>Universidad de Sevilla
>Av. Reina Mercedes 4b
>41012 Sevilla
>
>Tfno: 954559983


-- 
               **********************************************
Prof. James B. Pawley,               		            Ph.  608-263-3147 
Room 223, Zoology Research 
Building,              	            FAX 
608-265-5315
1117 Johnson Ave., Madison, WI, 53706  
[log in to unmask]
3D Microscopy of Living Cells Course, June 14-26, 2008, UBC, Vancouver Canada
Info: http://www.3dcourse.ubc.ca/	     Applications due by March 15, 2008
	       "If it ain't diffraction, it must be statistics." Anon.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2