Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:32:07 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Folks - sorry about the previous "post"-with-no-answer.
Got a bit ahead of myself!
Anyway - which Hoechst are they using? One is
cell-permeant (33342), one needs to have some membrane
disruption before it will enter (33258). I thought the
permeant version could cross cell walls, but it has been
ages since I've tried it on anything plantish, so I may be
mistaken. Maybe they're using 33258?
Tamara
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:42:56 -0400
"J.P. Shields" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hi everyone,
> I have a colleague asking me why their Aspergillus
>nidulans won't take up
> Hoechst stain very well until they have fixed briefly
>(1-2 minutes) in
> formaldehyde/buffer. Anyone else experienced this
>problem and (more
> importantly) know why it would be like this? Off the
>top of my head, I
> suspect the fixation disrupts the membrane potential,
>allowing particular
> molecules to enter more readily. However, it could have
>something to do with
> the chitinous cell wall?
>
> Thanks!
> John
>
> John Shields
> EM Lab, 151 Barrow Hall
> Univ. of Georgia
> *******
> Always and never are two words you should always
>remember never to use.
> - Wendell Johnson
***************************
Tamara Howard
Cell Biology & Physiology
UNM-HSC
Albuquerque, NM
***************************
|
|
|