Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:55:53 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
And then there is the cheap option. In some situations we use cheap
($800-1000) Firewire cameras and free (Micro-manager) or almost free
(BTV-Pro/AstroDC) software for fluorescence imaging. You don't need
cooled if you can see the signal by eye through the eyepiece and that
is nearly always the case. You don't need fast if you are doing
fixed samples. Dave
Dr. David Knecht
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility
U-3125
91 N. Eagleville Rd.
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
860-486-2200
860-486-4331 (fax)
On Jun 29, 2007, at 12:19 PM, B. Prabhakar Pandian wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Pablo,
> We have a cooled monochrome Cooke Sensicam QE (Cooke
> Corporation) and a cooled color Retiga Exi (Qimaging) . We are very
> happy with both of them.
> One thing you may want to keep in mind is that they are compatible
> with other softwares for time lapse.
>
> -Prabhakar
>
> Pablo González-Melendi wrote:
>> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>>
>> Does anybody have experience on digital cameras for a fluorescence
>> microscope? What are the best on the market and which are the main
>> specifications to be taken into account before making the decision to
>> buy?
>> Cheers
>> Pablo
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> B. Prabhakar Pandian
> CFD Research Corporation
> Biomedical Technology
> 215 Wynn Drive
> Huntsville, AL 35805
> Ph: 256-726-4942
> Fax: 256-726-4806
|
|
|